December 2011
3 posts
Dec 16th
13 notes
Dec 16th
1,738 notes
Dec 10th
8 notes
November 2011
2 posts
Nov 13th
Nov 7th
1 note
September 2011
3 posts
4 tags
Sep 20th
17 notes
Sep 18th
17 notes
4 tags
Sep 2nd
111 notes
August 2011
10 posts
1 tag
Aug 27th
232 notes
3 tags
Aug 26th
9,837 notes
1 tag
Aug 25th
834 notes
Aug 24th
110 notes
4 tags
Aug 20th
24,397 notes
2 tags
Aug 20th
190 notes
11 tags
Aug 20th
5,532 notes
Aug 5th
265 notes
Aug 5th
Haz clic en el cuadro naranja y presiona tu...
pelandobananas: Fucking awesome.
Aug 3rd
4,770 notes
July 2011
4 posts
Jul 12th
43 notes
Jul 3rd
13 notes
Jul 1st
2,771 notes
“La borró de la fotografía de su vida no porque no la hubiese amado, sino,...”
– ‘El libro de la risa y el olvido’ (Fragmento) Milan Kundera (via chachacharz)
Jul 1st
600 notes
June 2011
2 posts
Jun 30th
The Six Universal Attributes Of a Great Mark
If we weren’t in the room when the decisions were made, if we don’t know what the CEO’s intentions were, how can we say one logo is “better” than another? As in ice skating, technical merit can be judged independently of communications content, and we can all see the skater fall. The first five things that distinguish great marks from ordinary ones are technical; the last one addresses content. Great marks are always:
Distinctive. The design idea need not be unique in the world, just distinctive enough so you can “own” it in your particular marketplace.
Practical. Can be printed small, in ink or pixels; works in black on white as well as in colors; works in reverse too, white on black. (Faces, human or animal, usually flunk this last test; the eyes turn white.)
Graphic. Communicates purely in visual terms, to the right brain hemisphere; doesn’t depend on verbal, intellectual interpretation. (Example: Tenneco seriously considered and rejected a “10ECO” logo design. Clever, but it’s not a mark, it’s a pun.) If a wordmark, it can be recognized by form alone (you don’t have to “read” Coca-Cola’s logo more than once or twice).
Simple in form. Contains only one graphic idea, one gimmick, one dingbat. Thus if there’s a symbol, the accompanying name is plain and unadorned. And if it is a wordmark, one idea or device makes it special–like IBM’s stripes. (The more unique the name, the simpler the graphics can be.)
One message. In content too, great designs try to express no more than one attribute (such as stature or speed or dynamism) and support a single aspect of positioning.
Appropriate. In the end, of course, the content’s got to be right. An otherwise-great mark fails if the reputation, positioning, and personality expressed are at odds with management intentions.
T.S.
"Across the Board," February 1997
Jun 19th
May 2011
1 post
May 27th
April 2011
5 posts
Lola, go!: Diseñando desde el epicentro  →
lolago: Al comenzar un proyecto muchas veces nos encontramos con que no sabemos por dónde comenzar y estamos un poco desorientados sobre la forma correcta de encarar el nuevo proyecto. Jason Fried sugiere comenzar identificando la parte esencial de la web, aquello que le da sentido a toda la…
Apr 23rd
3 notes
Apr 23rd
Apr 19th
96 notes
Apr 12th
2 notes
Apr 2nd
5 notes
February 2011
2 posts
Feb 3rd
50,357 notes
Feb 1st
662 notes
December 2010
7 posts
Dec 31st
101 notes
Dec 11th
Dec 7th
22,587 notes
Dec 7th
4,865 notes
Dec 5th
1,045 notes
Dec 5th
1,433 notes
Dec 3rd
1 note
November 2010
13 posts
Nov 26th
4,753 notes
Nov 26th
7 notes
Nov 25th
Nov 25th
Nov 25th
Nov 24th
Nov 17th
Nov 12th
65 notes
Nov 9th
Nov 7th
915 notes
Nov 7th